Paper vs electronic medical records

But while they are similar in nature, they are actually quite different with respect to usage.

Paper vs electronic medical records

Who can edit:

Computerized Accounting As technology improves, the debate over whether to store medical records on paper or electronically grows. The issue is up for debate on a number of fronts, as both paper and electronic records offer strengths and weaknesses.

As medical facilities typically have years, if not decades, of paper records already, it can be an expensive proposition to try to change from paper to electronic medical records. Storage Storage of medical records is an area in which electronic medical records seem to have the edge.

Hospitals and medical providers often have warehouses literally filled with paper records. Besides taking up space, paper records are not eco-friendly. Electronic records can be stored on computer drives that require much less space and fewer resources to produce. Paper records also naturally deteriorate over time in storage, regardless of how well their environment is controlled, and they tend to decay upon excessive handling.

Computer records can in theory be stored and accessed forever, without the deterioration of record quality. Legibility While doctors may have a reputation for poor penmanship, few people in any profession can write as clearly as a computer word processor can.

Paper medical records can be difficult to decipher, particularly for those unfamiliar with medical terminology. One of the clear benefits of electronic records is that typeface is more or less standardized and clear across all records.

This clarity saves time for the reader, and time can be critical in medical treatment. However, doctors or their assistants who are unfamiliar with the best practices of word processing technology may find it time-consuming to enter records electronically.

Access One of the main benefits of electronic medical records is that they can be shared with other professionals almost instantaneously via electronic transmission or direct access to a storage system.

For paper records to reach other interested parties, they must either be mailed or converted to electronic format, such as via scanning and emailing, before they can be accessed. Security Both paper and electronic record storage systems have some security vulnerabilities.

Electronic records are susceptible to hackers and other unauthorized individuals who can gain access by breaking down the electronic defenses of a storage system.

Electronic records can also be rendered inaccessible due to system crashes or other electronic malfunctions. Paper records are generally safe unless someone physically breaks into a storage unit.

Both types of records can be susceptible to natural disasters such as fires and floods; however, a facility will typically have only one copy of a paper record, versus at least one backup copy of an electronic record.The primary difference between Electronic Health Records and Electronic Medical Records is therefore the intended use.

An EMR system is an early version of, or a stepping stone to, the implementation of an EHR system. Paper Records vs. Electronic Records? The Great Debate.

Paper vs electronic medical records

Posted by Scott Hambrick. Tweet; Should you store your paper records or digitize your documents? We discuss pros and cons of each. Pros of going digital.

If you store records in an electronic document management system, you run the risk of that system being no longer . The study, which assessed and compared the quality of nursing documentation in both electronic and paper records, used a retrospective, descriptive, comparative design.

Investigators audited records for both paper-based health records and EHRs from medical and surgical wards. An electronic health record (EHR), or electronic medical record (EMR), is the systematized collection of patient and population electronically-stored health information in a digital format.

These records can be shared across different health care settings. This bill has financial incentives in place for medical practices who switch from the old method of paper medical health records to the new electronic method, as long as the system or software is certified and practice can demonstrate meaningful use of the system.

Blog; 5 Benefits of EMR (Electronic Medical Records) vs. Paper Medical Records; Paper medical records are often difficult to read and understand, mostly due to the physician’s illegible penmanship.

Likewise, paper records often have insufficient space for healthcare professionals to write all necessary information. Electronic records, on.

Paper vs electronic medical records
Paper vs. Electronic Medical Records | srmvision.com