The Road has no personal animosity against you, Mr. Coleman, but you represent the public; and the Road is determined to make it so terrible for the public to fight it, right or wrong, that they will stop it. We are not going to be attacked in this way.
THE problem of our age is the proper administration of wealth, so that the ties of brotherhood may still bind together the rich and poor in harmonious relationship. The conditions of human life have not only been changed, but revolutionized, within the past few hundred years.
In former days there was little difference between the dwelling, dress, food, and environment of the chief and those of his retainers. The Indians are to-day where civilized man then was. When visiting the Sioux, I was led to the wigwam of the chief.
It was just like the others in external appearance, and even within the difference was trifling between it and those of the poorest of his braves. The contrast between the palace of the millionaire and the cottage of the laborer with us to-day meas- ures the change which has come with civilization.
This change, however, is not to be deplored, but welcomed as highly beneficial. It is well, nay, essential for the progress of the race, that the houses of some should be homes for all that is highest and best in literature and the arts, and for all the refine- ments of civilization, rather than that none should be so.
Much better this great irregularity than universal squalor. The good old times were not good old times. Neither master nor servant was as well situ- ated then as to-day.
A relapse to old conditions would be disas- trous to bothnot the least so to him who servesand would sweep away civilization with it. But whether the change be for VOL. It is a waste of time to criticise the inevitable.
It is easy to see how the change has come. One illustration will serve for almost every phase of the cause. In the manu- facture of products we have the whole story. Formerly articles were manufactured at the domestic hearth or in small shops which formed part of the household.
The master and his apprentices worked side by side, the latter living with the master, and there- fore subject to the same conditions. When these apprentices rose to be masters, there was little or no change in their mode of life, and they, in turn, educated in the same routine succeeding appren- tices.
There was, substantially, social equality, and even political equality, for those engaged in industrial pursuits had then little or no political voice in the State. To-day the world obtains corn- modities of excellent quality at prices which even the generation preceding this would have deemed incredible.
In the commer- cial world similar causes have produced similar results, and the race is benefited thereby. The poor enjoy what the rich could not before afford. What were the luxuries have become the neces- saries of life. The laborer has now more comforts than the farmer had a few generations ago.
The farmer has more luxuries than the landlord had, and is more richly clad and better housed. The landlord has books and pictures rarer, and appointments more artistic, than the King could then obtain.
The price we pay for this salutary change is, no doubt, great. We assemble thousands of operatives in the factory, in the mine, and in the counting-house, of whom the employer can know little or nothi4g, and to whom the employer is little better than a myth.
All intercourse between them is at an end.
Rigid Castes are formed, and, as usual, mutual ignorance breeds mutual dis- trust. Each Caste is without sympathy for the other, and ready to credit anything disparaging in regard to it.
Under the law of competition, the employer of thousands is forced into the strictest economies, among which the rates paid to labor figure prominently, and often there is friction between the employer WEALTIL and the employed, between capital and labor, between rich and poor.
Human society loses homogeneity. The price which society pays for the law of competition, like the price it pays for cheap comforts and luxuries, is also great; but the advantages of this law are also greater still, for it is to this law that we owe our wonderful material development, which brings improved conditions in its train.
But, whether the law be benign or not, we must say of it, as we say of the change in the conditions of men to which we have referred: It is here; we cannot evade it; no substitutes for it have been found; and while the law may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department.
We accept and welcome, therefore, as condi- tions to which we must accommodate ourselves, great inequality of environment, the concentration of business, industrial and commercial, in the hands of a few, and the law of competition between these, as being not only beneficial, but essential for the future progress of the race.
Having accepted these, it follows that there must be great scope for the exercise of special ability in the merchant and in th manufacturer who has to conduct affairs upon a great scale.
That this talent for organization and management is rare among men is proved by the fact that it invariably secures for its possessor enormous rewards, no matter where or under what laws or conditions.
Such men become interested in firms or corporations using millions; and estimating only simple interest to be made upon the capital in- vested, it is inevitable that their income must exceed their ex- penditures, and that they must accumulate wealth.
Nor is there any middle ground which such men can occupy, because the great manufacturing or commercial concern which does not earn at least interest upon its capital soon becomes bankrupt. It must either go forward or fall behind:Coriolanus Julius Caesar Antony and Cleopatra As with the Roman plays, although both are connected with British history, and based on similar sources, they are usually not considered part of Shakespeares .
These were Much Ado about Nothing (possibly performed twice, but details unknown), The Tempest, Othello, The Winters Tale, Julius Caesar, 1 Henry IV, and 2 Henry IV. 55 Shakespeare and his fellow players efforts to curry favour with Anne of Denmark and her daughter were therefore successful to .
Julius Caesar: History vs. Drama Shakespeare is notorious for pliable history, that which he can bend, stretch, mold and work into any shape which pleases him and helps him make a dramatic (and–if you’re inclined–political) point. Plutarchs version is more sympathetic to Caear's situation.
Shakespeare shows him to be an insensitive and conceited person thinking only of himself.
This is shown by his reaction to Calpurnia's dream. After her description of her dream he says, "Caesar shall forth. In Julius Caesar, a tragedy written by Shakespeare in However, no two accounts on Caesar’s life are the same.
A good example of this diversity is Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar compared to Plutarch’s The Life of Caesar. Although Shakespeare used Plutarch’s work as his basis for the play, the two accounts ended up totally different.
One of Freuds example is form Shakespeares Julius Ceasar, when Marc Antony repeats again and again that Brutus is an honourable man, meaning the opposite (Of course, this case could hardly be distinguished from what we traditionally call irony: saying something and meaning the opposite, e.g.
you are very clever!, meaning, you are terribly stupid).